Ok, I'm a little calmer today, but a promise is a promise. We've covered the alarming results in Oklahoma, but so many other disturbing things happened on Tuesday. Let's make Human Rights our theme for the day....
1) Iowa votes out ALL of the Supreme Court Justices up for re-election just because they ruled in favor of gay marriage.... seriously? Those positions are always a rubber stamp in election season because frankly no one ever pays attention to what the Iowa Supreme Court is doing unless it has to do with gays or guns (imagine the press surge if they were talking about giving guns to the gays!) Again with the fear-mongering! I would be way more respectful of the decision to oust the entire court if the people that voted for it could list me 2 other rulings each of those justices had made, but I would lay some money down that they can't. But more importantly, what happened to us as a country that we are trending towards REMOVING rights? I know I am not subtle about my gay rights beliefs, but this is becoming a human issue, not a sexual preference issue. We are fighting about the right to committ to someone and have that relationship legally protected. No one is trying to outlaw straight marriage, so opponents' rights are not on the line here. It is troublesome to me how threatened people get by the choices other people are making that don't even affect them at all. Nothing will up voter turnout like a good gay-bashing referendum, and still we puzzle over increased suicides and cries for help. I had to choose between my job security and my belief about gay rights just one time, and I have never questioned my decision... I hope the same is true for the 3 judges that lost their jobs for their integrity this week.
2) Oh, Arizonia... you are such an enigma. Here is what you accomplished this week: hunting is now a constitutional right, affirmative action is now illegal, but medical marijuana is now legal... ???? I am a little confused (I'm not actually, but that sounds nicer than I think you're dumb and I should stop saying that about the entire state), you made the effort to ensure the rights for guns and drugs but took away the rights of the minority and still are unapologetic for what you have done to the rights of the immigrant. It is starting to look like you love freedom as long as it is only granted to the people who look, act, and believe exactly like you do.... do you get how elitist that looks to the rest of us? Some rights are more important to be in the constitution than hunting, for example: the right to due process, the rights of search and siezure, the right for equal employment opportunity, and even the right to be non-white or non-male in Arizona. You can check out those rights in the constitution that the rest of us believe in. Just sayin'
3) I was going to keep going, but some of the irritation is coming back - so lets save a little of my self-righteous ranting for tomorrow.... just 2 more years until we get a chance to try this again.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Election Hangover
Last night was rough in many places for many reasons; let me count the ways...
1) State Questions in Oklahoma. Last night the people of Oklahoma, in generally supermajority terms, accomplished the following things: refused to bring spending on education per child up to the average of our surrounding states; we voted in a governor who made one of her qualifications that you have to be married and have kids to run a state (implied message that her lack of political experience compared to opponent was irrelevant because her opponent wasn't a traditional woman); courts are only allowed to consider state and federal law in deliberations, not international law (only example was forbidding Sharia, Islamic law); all official state business must be conducted in either English or Native American languages, note that it actually said in the referendum that that official state business was not defined.
2) Ok, so Oklahoma itself is enough for one day.
- I am so frustrated today. Not because all these things passed (I figured they would) or because of the giant shift in National power (we all knew it was coming), but because of the mindset the election results reveal. We are so polarized that people have stopped feeling the need to think for themselves and have their decision-making default set on fear. We decided not to give our children and our future a real shot at success not because we hate our kids (no one hates kids holistically), but because we bought into the pie pieces-fear. You can't give money that they need to them, because it will get taken away from me! No one was actually opposed to spending money on education (I hope, but might be wrong) we just didn't trust the legislature to figure out how to pay for it without taking away all of our other social support system. That can't be true. I don't believe that we ever really were choosing between hospitals and schools, between education and mental health - that was fear propaganda that ignored the possibility to get rid of wasteful spending instead - but fear sells and 70% of Oklahoma voters were buying.
- And then there is the state language issue.... did the 75% of you that voted for that read it?? Really READ it?? First of all it says all state action, but acknowledges that it doesn't know what that means exactly. Second, it gives the legislature a blank check to pass whatever laws they want about requiring English. Third, it does allow you to speak a Native language if you want, but that's it! Sooo.... let's look at the fear message included in that.... I have been in the state for a few years now and NEVER been in a situation were someone around me was trying to conduct official business, but only spoke a Native language - this is immigrant bullying. It prohibits you from suing if you get taken advantage of because there was a language barrier, and it sets the stage for you to be fearful of what's coming if you came here for survival before your Rosetta Stone arrived to learn English. What exactly are we afraid of? That the foreigners are going to take over the state and WE will have to learn a new language, or that we will be bothered with the sound of diversity all around us, or worse yet, that at some point we will be encouraged to join the rest of the world in being multilingual?
I am tired of fear-mongering, tired of polarizations, tired of the belief that you are either right or terrifying; and I am disappointed in Oklahoma.
Stay tuned tomorrow for discussions about: Iowa, the Carolinas, Wisconsin, and SOO many other reasons why I might start looking for where I put my Canadian citizenship application just case things start to get really bad....
1) State Questions in Oklahoma. Last night the people of Oklahoma, in generally supermajority terms, accomplished the following things: refused to bring spending on education per child up to the average of our surrounding states; we voted in a governor who made one of her qualifications that you have to be married and have kids to run a state (implied message that her lack of political experience compared to opponent was irrelevant because her opponent wasn't a traditional woman); courts are only allowed to consider state and federal law in deliberations, not international law (only example was forbidding Sharia, Islamic law); all official state business must be conducted in either English or Native American languages, note that it actually said in the referendum that that official state business was not defined.
2) Ok, so Oklahoma itself is enough for one day.
- I am so frustrated today. Not because all these things passed (I figured they would) or because of the giant shift in National power (we all knew it was coming), but because of the mindset the election results reveal. We are so polarized that people have stopped feeling the need to think for themselves and have their decision-making default set on fear. We decided not to give our children and our future a real shot at success not because we hate our kids (no one hates kids holistically), but because we bought into the pie pieces-fear. You can't give money that they need to them, because it will get taken away from me! No one was actually opposed to spending money on education (I hope, but might be wrong) we just didn't trust the legislature to figure out how to pay for it without taking away all of our other social support system. That can't be true. I don't believe that we ever really were choosing between hospitals and schools, between education and mental health - that was fear propaganda that ignored the possibility to get rid of wasteful spending instead - but fear sells and 70% of Oklahoma voters were buying.
- And then there is the state language issue.... did the 75% of you that voted for that read it?? Really READ it?? First of all it says all state action, but acknowledges that it doesn't know what that means exactly. Second, it gives the legislature a blank check to pass whatever laws they want about requiring English. Third, it does allow you to speak a Native language if you want, but that's it! Sooo.... let's look at the fear message included in that.... I have been in the state for a few years now and NEVER been in a situation were someone around me was trying to conduct official business, but only spoke a Native language - this is immigrant bullying. It prohibits you from suing if you get taken advantage of because there was a language barrier, and it sets the stage for you to be fearful of what's coming if you came here for survival before your Rosetta Stone arrived to learn English. What exactly are we afraid of? That the foreigners are going to take over the state and WE will have to learn a new language, or that we will be bothered with the sound of diversity all around us, or worse yet, that at some point we will be encouraged to join the rest of the world in being multilingual?
I am tired of fear-mongering, tired of polarizations, tired of the belief that you are either right or terrifying; and I am disappointed in Oklahoma.
Stay tuned tomorrow for discussions about: Iowa, the Carolinas, Wisconsin, and SOO many other reasons why I might start looking for where I put my Canadian citizenship application just case things start to get really bad....
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Gay is not a Prosecutable Offense!
Ugh... that's really all I have about today's news story. I know that I seem to have gotten stuck on the topic of Gay Rights, but both stories that I have reflected on really tick me off.
First an update on Pastor Long - he has continued his denial, and I am thrilled to see that one of the victims has had enough. He has spoken out calling the pastor a liar and a monster, which seems like a good use of righteous anger to me!
And now for today's news story: State Attorney bullies and cyber-stalks college student body president. Seriously?? This is where this guy is going to take his moral stand? In a fight with a COLLEGE STUDENT??? And not only does he not like the guy, he has done ALL of the following: created a blog for the sole purpose of attacking him, protested outside his house, had his friends help him scour the student's facebook page and friends of the student's pages for pictures he can deface and post on his blog, and attended student council meetings to demand the student's resignation. Again, I say: Ugh.
I know you must be wondering what this student has done that would evoke such a hateful reaction from a grown man in a public office. Proposed group sex as an intermural activity? Gave gay students special rights and funding? Turned the campus in to a haven for debauchery and heathenism? (Well it is a college campus, so some things are assumed, but....) The basic answer is: Nope, according to his record he has been a good and fair Student Body President. In fact, he has made one proposal that I wish more people were talking about: Gender-nuetral housing for transgender students in the midst of sex-reassignment surgery. What a scandal! Asking a college to consider the unique and special needs of a small group of students with a simple solution.
Ok, now that I have gotten some of my anger vented; let's look the fact that there is actually some good news in this story: 1) The University of Michgan elected and is supporting an openly gay Student Body President. 2) The State of Michigan understands the difference between personal and professional beliefs. (they have a policy that allows state employees to express their beliefs and personal views on off hours without repricussions) 3) It is bringing attention to how childish and vendetta-like opponents to gay rights sometimes become. 4) Most observers seem befuddled at how the state attorney is behaving, and that is hopeful considering how heterosexist the world sometimes feels.
First an update on Pastor Long - he has continued his denial, and I am thrilled to see that one of the victims has had enough. He has spoken out calling the pastor a liar and a monster, which seems like a good use of righteous anger to me!
And now for today's news story: State Attorney bullies and cyber-stalks college student body president. Seriously?? This is where this guy is going to take his moral stand? In a fight with a COLLEGE STUDENT??? And not only does he not like the guy, he has done ALL of the following: created a blog for the sole purpose of attacking him, protested outside his house, had his friends help him scour the student's facebook page and friends of the student's pages for pictures he can deface and post on his blog, and attended student council meetings to demand the student's resignation. Again, I say: Ugh.
I know you must be wondering what this student has done that would evoke such a hateful reaction from a grown man in a public office. Proposed group sex as an intermural activity? Gave gay students special rights and funding? Turned the campus in to a haven for debauchery and heathenism? (Well it is a college campus, so some things are assumed, but....) The basic answer is: Nope, according to his record he has been a good and fair Student Body President. In fact, he has made one proposal that I wish more people were talking about: Gender-nuetral housing for transgender students in the midst of sex-reassignment surgery. What a scandal! Asking a college to consider the unique and special needs of a small group of students with a simple solution.
Ok, now that I have gotten some of my anger vented; let's look the fact that there is actually some good news in this story: 1) The University of Michgan elected and is supporting an openly gay Student Body President. 2) The State of Michigan understands the difference between personal and professional beliefs. (they have a policy that allows state employees to express their beliefs and personal views on off hours without repricussions) 3) It is bringing attention to how childish and vendetta-like opponents to gay rights sometimes become. 4) Most observers seem befuddled at how the state attorney is behaving, and that is hopeful considering how heterosexist the world sometimes feels.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Pastor to Pastor
Yet again there is a pastor in the news for both preaching against homosexuality AND facing accusations of inappropriate sexual encounters with someone of the same sex. This case is actually way more upsetting to me personally than the Haggard case for several reasons...
1) Abuse of Power. This pastor is accused of manipulating young male parishioners into sexual acts with him. So not only was he living with unspeakable hypocrisy, but he chose victims that he thought would be forced to keep his secret. Like any abuse case, he preyed on the weak because in weakness there is silence.
2) Denial. At least with Haggard, when he got caught he fessed up and resigned. Not that I loved his plan for gay rehab, but at the least he accepted his secrets seeing the light of day with humility and embarrassment. This new case has not shown the same kind of reaction. He is currently promising to put up a fight against his accusers and is calling them liars. In fairness, he has the right to innocence until proven guilty ... But can you think of a single case where these charges turned out to be fabricated? Right now the victims, instead of moving into recovery and counseling, are having to defend their trauma and face accusations of lies and intentional destruction.
3) You're not helping. There is already the VERY false myth out there that pedoflia and homosexuality are linked. Let me be really clear about this - NO, THEY ARE NOT. Those are two very different issues. One is matter of preference and creation, and the other is a criminal sexual disorder - only parinoia and ignorance create an automatic link between the two. So to hide your sexuality and resort to young males in your congregation... not a help to the cause of truth and justice.
4) The larger problem: letting fear prevent truth. It is about time that this same story stop getting repeated. If you are preaching that God is about love and grace, then why work so hard to cover up who you have discovered you are? Just because you preach that homosexuality is a sin doesn't make it go away. We are who we are, and God knows that from the second we are created. To try and hide and suppress how we were created or who we love is just asking to end up drowning in lies and scandal. Nothing good ever comes from lying to ourselves, and usually ends up in lying to others. The God that I follow is way better at loving me than I am at loving myself, and part of my daily walk is to try and accept the grace that is offered to me. So why feel the need to condemn others and lie to yourself when God is waiting to love you and help you feel whole? The truth is like a swing, the harder you push it away, the harder it comes back and smacks you in the face.
1) Abuse of Power. This pastor is accused of manipulating young male parishioners into sexual acts with him. So not only was he living with unspeakable hypocrisy, but he chose victims that he thought would be forced to keep his secret. Like any abuse case, he preyed on the weak because in weakness there is silence.
2) Denial. At least with Haggard, when he got caught he fessed up and resigned. Not that I loved his plan for gay rehab, but at the least he accepted his secrets seeing the light of day with humility and embarrassment. This new case has not shown the same kind of reaction. He is currently promising to put up a fight against his accusers and is calling them liars. In fairness, he has the right to innocence until proven guilty ... But can you think of a single case where these charges turned out to be fabricated? Right now the victims, instead of moving into recovery and counseling, are having to defend their trauma and face accusations of lies and intentional destruction.
3) You're not helping. There is already the VERY false myth out there that pedoflia and homosexuality are linked. Let me be really clear about this - NO, THEY ARE NOT. Those are two very different issues. One is matter of preference and creation, and the other is a criminal sexual disorder - only parinoia and ignorance create an automatic link between the two. So to hide your sexuality and resort to young males in your congregation... not a help to the cause of truth and justice.
4) The larger problem: letting fear prevent truth. It is about time that this same story stop getting repeated. If you are preaching that God is about love and grace, then why work so hard to cover up who you have discovered you are? Just because you preach that homosexuality is a sin doesn't make it go away. We are who we are, and God knows that from the second we are created. To try and hide and suppress how we were created or who we love is just asking to end up drowning in lies and scandal. Nothing good ever comes from lying to ourselves, and usually ends up in lying to others. The God that I follow is way better at loving me than I am at loving myself, and part of my daily walk is to try and accept the grace that is offered to me. So why feel the need to condemn others and lie to yourself when God is waiting to love you and help you feel whole? The truth is like a swing, the harder you push it away, the harder it comes back and smacks you in the face.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Serious Problem, with jokes.
Stephen Colbert is a brave man, and I am taking a public stance that I support and respect him. You would think that someone who had been politically flogged for his performance at the White House Press dinner several years ago would stay as far away from Washington as possible, but today he testified before Congress. I admit that he showed up in character, and made his usual jokes, but what so many people in Congress, and in the press, seemed to miss was that he made some really good points and had every right to be there. You don't invite a clown to your party and then get irritated when they show up in their make-up, and you don't extend an invitation to Stephen Colbert to report on a story he did for his show and then get mad when he shows up as the host of his show. If the people that are criticizing him would take a step back for a second, here are the things they would see behind the humor....
1) Stephen didn't show up unprepared. He was there by invitation because he did something only 16 other people in this country have been willing to do. He accepted the challenge and offer extended by the Farm Workers association to "Take our Jobs, Please" and he worked alongside migrant farm workers for a day to see what that life is really like. Before working he met with the head of the House Committee and heard what she had to say on the subject. He was invited to the program personally by the head of the Farm Workers Association and spent time on his show asking about issues and getting personally involved. He also has spoken on the subject in more places than just today's hearing, and in all the other locations was treated with respect.
2) He's not wrong. The points that he made during his speech were accurate and his answers to questions were respectful but personal. He admitted when he didn't know something but mostly he stuck to his position that there is a problem and something has to be done. The work that migrant farms workers do, whether they are authorized or undocumented residents, are doing jobs that almost all Americans will not do. The initiative to offer migrant positions has been ignored, and until Colbert accepted the invitation to experience that back-breaking labor, only 3 people nationwide had answered the call, and even since only 16 have been willing to see what that daily life is like. Research has shown that when given a choice between migrant farm work and no work at all, the VAST majority of people will choose no income - and Stephen pointed out that it isn't even really an immigration issue as much as it is a basic human rights issue. He came out in support of better immigration enforcement because when people aren't working to make sure they aren't caught for being in the country, then they also don't have to be afraid to speak out about injustices and exploitation.
3) Stephen knows he is being used, and he is willing. There was no denial that he was there because it meant the media would be there too. Without his testimony, there would have been no coverage of this hearing, no conversation about this real problem, and no progress for the rights and safety of the workers at the very base of our economy. Unless you go looking for information, you don't hear about the: abuse of migrant workers, the high number of corrupt and dishonest employers of people who have no voice to defend themselves, and the real threat to EVERYONE's livelihood if we were to lose the people who are actually willing to do the jobs we won't do in our fields and elsewhere.
4) He was not the dumbest person in the room. That title, as is often the case, goes to my personal embarrassment: Steven King R-IA. Ok, he might not have been the dumbest person in the room, I wasn't there to take a full inventory, but I have a strong feeling I'm not wrong. As usual, I had to listen to this Iowa Disappointment in short segments because I kept getting too mad. It is unfair for King to question the experiences of Colbert on the basis that he is from a farming state when he has likely never spent a day in the fields do that kind of work. But more importantly, I know his home district and he is flat out wrong that Americans will do that work and Iowa is proof, DEAD WRONG. For years I lived in a community right down the road from Mr. Ignorant, and there are some places I would like to take him on tours of: the dairy farm where I taught a family English and heard tales of exploitation and injustice, the packing plants where safety doesn't have to be worried about because they hire people who are too afraid to say anything, and chicken houses that have as many English-speaking workers as they do English proficient chickens. The truth is that our fields can be harvested with machines so King doesn't see the same migration of workers that sacrifice their bodies and rights for a minimal income, but it doesn't mean that it isn't a problem in my beloved state.
5) If Colbert didn't know what he was talking about, his testimony would not have been in collaboration with 2 of the other witnesses. The people who sat beside Stephen agreed with him and appreciated his presence. There was not one challenge from that table, so why the Representative couldn't see past the humor to the sincerity of his message is a mystery to me.
My personal testimony: Every time we walk through the produce aisle, it is on the backs of foreign born workers. We have made them a silent and ignored lifeblood of our food system, and that makes me sad. Immigration is a problem, but so is exploiting people who are too afraid to ask to be treated fairly. There are some wonderful Farmers out there who treat their workers fairly and honestly, and know they have employees who are doing work he can't get from the average American - but sadly that isn't the norm. I admit that I love paying $2.97 for a watermelon and $0.50 a pound for grapes, but I would rather know that all the healthy foods we rely on weren't brought to me on the wings of injustice. I'm with you Stephen!
1) Stephen didn't show up unprepared. He was there by invitation because he did something only 16 other people in this country have been willing to do. He accepted the challenge and offer extended by the Farm Workers association to "Take our Jobs, Please" and he worked alongside migrant farm workers for a day to see what that life is really like. Before working he met with the head of the House Committee and heard what she had to say on the subject. He was invited to the program personally by the head of the Farm Workers Association and spent time on his show asking about issues and getting personally involved. He also has spoken on the subject in more places than just today's hearing, and in all the other locations was treated with respect.
2) He's not wrong. The points that he made during his speech were accurate and his answers to questions were respectful but personal. He admitted when he didn't know something but mostly he stuck to his position that there is a problem and something has to be done. The work that migrant farms workers do, whether they are authorized or undocumented residents, are doing jobs that almost all Americans will not do. The initiative to offer migrant positions has been ignored, and until Colbert accepted the invitation to experience that back-breaking labor, only 3 people nationwide had answered the call, and even since only 16 have been willing to see what that daily life is like. Research has shown that when given a choice between migrant farm work and no work at all, the VAST majority of people will choose no income - and Stephen pointed out that it isn't even really an immigration issue as much as it is a basic human rights issue. He came out in support of better immigration enforcement because when people aren't working to make sure they aren't caught for being in the country, then they also don't have to be afraid to speak out about injustices and exploitation.
3) Stephen knows he is being used, and he is willing. There was no denial that he was there because it meant the media would be there too. Without his testimony, there would have been no coverage of this hearing, no conversation about this real problem, and no progress for the rights and safety of the workers at the very base of our economy. Unless you go looking for information, you don't hear about the: abuse of migrant workers, the high number of corrupt and dishonest employers of people who have no voice to defend themselves, and the real threat to EVERYONE's livelihood if we were to lose the people who are actually willing to do the jobs we won't do in our fields and elsewhere.
4) He was not the dumbest person in the room. That title, as is often the case, goes to my personal embarrassment: Steven King R-IA. Ok, he might not have been the dumbest person in the room, I wasn't there to take a full inventory, but I have a strong feeling I'm not wrong. As usual, I had to listen to this Iowa Disappointment in short segments because I kept getting too mad. It is unfair for King to question the experiences of Colbert on the basis that he is from a farming state when he has likely never spent a day in the fields do that kind of work. But more importantly, I know his home district and he is flat out wrong that Americans will do that work and Iowa is proof, DEAD WRONG. For years I lived in a community right down the road from Mr. Ignorant, and there are some places I would like to take him on tours of: the dairy farm where I taught a family English and heard tales of exploitation and injustice, the packing plants where safety doesn't have to be worried about because they hire people who are too afraid to say anything, and chicken houses that have as many English-speaking workers as they do English proficient chickens. The truth is that our fields can be harvested with machines so King doesn't see the same migration of workers that sacrifice their bodies and rights for a minimal income, but it doesn't mean that it isn't a problem in my beloved state.
5) If Colbert didn't know what he was talking about, his testimony would not have been in collaboration with 2 of the other witnesses. The people who sat beside Stephen agreed with him and appreciated his presence. There was not one challenge from that table, so why the Representative couldn't see past the humor to the sincerity of his message is a mystery to me.
My personal testimony: Every time we walk through the produce aisle, it is on the backs of foreign born workers. We have made them a silent and ignored lifeblood of our food system, and that makes me sad. Immigration is a problem, but so is exploiting people who are too afraid to ask to be treated fairly. There are some wonderful Farmers out there who treat their workers fairly and honestly, and know they have employees who are doing work he can't get from the average American - but sadly that isn't the norm. I admit that I love paying $2.97 for a watermelon and $0.50 a pound for grapes, but I would rather know that all the healthy foods we rely on weren't brought to me on the wings of injustice. I'm with you Stephen!
And, one more time!
I have been thinking for awhile that I love the idea (stolen admittedly) of committing to something every day for a whole year, but I had no inspiration on what to do myself that I would be willing to take on for 365 days in a row. It all turns out that I have been having some guilt about how neglectful I have been of this blog that I started as a personal spiritual discipline. So lets try something for a week: I will reflect on a news story of the day from a personal, but also theological, perspective and if I can do it for a whole week, then maybe this is my year undertaking. It probably doesn't hurt that I am fired up today, but let's not run the posts together. Ok, so how about a current events journal with a faith twist, starting....... NOW!
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Am I ignorning the deeper issues in life?
Hmmm.... I don't think so.... but perhaps. I feel like for me the deeper issues are things like: justice, love, compassion, responsibility; and I feel like I do spend a good amount of time thinking about those issues. What I think I am guilty of is failing to put God into those deeper issues. I believe that God wants equality for everyone and the end of violence and hatred.... but I don't always state my beliefs on the subject of justice as a faith issue. I know that Creator God is a loving God who cares for us, and my tree-hugger beliefs include the understand that one of the ways we express our gratitude to the Creator is to care for all of creation... but that isn't usually included in my soapbox statements about electric cars and recycling.
I don't think I live a completely self-involved life, but that's probably a sign that I do. I admit to being more concerned about my daily life than the bigger picture on the average day - and I will work to shift that balance. More importantly, I want to work to include God more in my language and practice of my daily life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)